Genesis chapter 22
A couple of friends of mine would argue about the theological implications of God asking Abraham to sacrifice his son. Many read it as Abraham is willing to follow God anywhere. In this way he comes across as religious freak you can't relate to. Today I learned much about this passage, and only the first three sections. I know people know that Jews love to analyze the holy texts, and many think over analyze. But if you don't understand how something is written, you'll never understand what it is trying to tell you. The second passage, God says "Take your son". It is not properly translated. God actually says "
Please take your son". God doesn't say please. But here he does because he knows what he is about to ask is large. It tells Abraham in one word to trust God, he's going to ask something big, but that it will be okay. He goes on: "take your son, your favored son (or 'the son you love'), Isaac." Ever wonder why he says it three times? Abraham interjects. "I have two sons." Then "I love both sons." Abraham is interjecting between God's words to make sure he knows what God is asking. Then the passage "offer him there as a burnt offering." The word there is used later in the bible to signify burnt offerings, an animal that was killed and then torched on an alter. But the word itself is really just offering. God pretty much asks, offer your son to me. He chooses his words extremely carefully, and because Abraham is listening carefully (because he hear the please), he will know God hasn't actually asked him to kill his son. Even when they're walking up there, when Isaac asks where the sacrifice is, Abraham says "God will provide." He knows God will provide something to kill, but not his son.
Oh, and medieval scholars saw the next part, where Abraham leaves the mountain alone and then two chapters later Isaac finally reappears, as saying Abraham truly went through with it and God resurrected Isaac. Either explanation trumps the Jesus thing, because the first shows that God already saved a favored son, and doesn't kill them for his love, and the second basically says, "hey, this already happened. Jesus is redundant." But medieval scholars were dark and depressing, and we don't follow their views anymore.
I hope I didn't offend anyone. I just really want to dig into this more. Language is so thick with meaning. I
love going through it this way. I also wish it were still last year so that I could debate with Eric, Shannon and Christina, my favorite people all from different religious backgrounds and views. I guess long lj entries will have to do for now.